Home | About Us | Past Featured Subjects | Bulletins | Sermons & Audio | Studies In The Cross Of Christ

Please use this page to submit your Bible Question.

You will also find answers to other's questions.

Please also click below to find Adobe Acrobat files containing questions that were answered in previous Question Nights.

 

Question Archives

Feedback and Questions July-Aug 2006

Question Archives

Question Night - 1

Question on Divorce and Remarriage

Question on Inspiration of the Bible

Question on Undenominational Christianity

Question on Who We Should Use in Worship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get Adobe Reader

Click here to
download
Adobe Acrobat Reader

Click here to
download
Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer

 

Reader Responses - Feedback And Questions

 

Click on any red titles to read the article that brought a response

In Response to "Clapping in Worship" 

Editors Note: The most read article for the July-August period was Gardner Hall's piece on clapping in worship. It also brought two very angry responses from men who preach. Here is their response and my reply.

Larry,

 I’m not sure how I got on your list, but please remove my two addresses:  --------------and ------------------.  I am my church family are no longer associated with your sectarian and legalistic fellowship. 

Thank you,

Mike

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

My Reply:

Hello Brother Jeffress, 

You have successfully been removed from the list. 

Your strong response has raised several questions in my mind that I am asking you as a brother in Christ. What in my material has brought such a response? You would be my friend indeed if you would help lead me from sectarianism and legalism. I am asking this sincerely and would be open to any material you may have to share. 

In love to you, I also ask that you examine your motives as well. You may be responding in anger out of past dealings with other people. While I do understand how past wounds often hurt and are hard to heal, you need to be careful in writing off others spiritually. As an evangelist you surely you know this since you certainly have been on the receiving end of these kinds of responses yourself! 

As I mentioned, I am happy to remove you from the list. I do not have a problem with that. 

May the Lord bless you in your work for Him. 

In Christian Love,

Larry Rouse

__________________________________________________________

Editors Note:

There was no response from brother Jeffress.

When this publication began in September  of 2005, I included all churches of Christ in Virginia that had a presence on the web  in my e-mail list. I realize that there are many things that are taught and believed by churches that  go by that name. For the record, I have never personally known brother Jeffress nor have I ever been associated with the before mentioned "fellowship" that he left. Our brother obviously has some bitterness towards those in his past.

I remain open to being taught and corrected from God's word. Sadly, so far, our brother has called me and those within "my fellowship" some names and then severed contact.

___________________________________________________________

Here is the second preacher's response:

How did I start getting this false teaching in my email?

Steve

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

My Reply:

Steve, 

You have been successfully removed from the list. 

You did, however, arouse my curiosity. What false teaching did you find? You would be my friend to show me anything that is not right! I say this with utmost sincerity and not in any blind "self-defense" or self-righteousness. 

In Christian Love,

Larry Rouse

__________________________________________________________

Editors Note:

There was no response from brother Steve.

Our brother has posted this about himself on a website: " Progressive-minded minister …. who is grace-driven, outreach-focused, Spirit-filled and Bible-based."

He describes an effective church as: " will highly value teaching the Word, contemporary praise and worship.."

He also describes his work with a church as: "emphasizing contemporary praise and worship songs as opposed to traditional hymns. We believe that clapping and raising of hands in praise should be encouraged but not mandatory."

When I included the article on "Clapping in Worship" in my publication, I had no idea that it would bring such strong responses! The article was written in a careful and Bible centered manner. While I could always expect brotherly disagreement, I never thought a careful study on this subject would produce such anger.

I am concerned when men, in or out of the pulpit, describe themselves as "grace-driven" or being free from the "legalistic" views of the Pharisee's act in this way. I will leave you with a quote to consider from a recent article published  on our site called "Turning the Grace of God into a Carnal Weapon."

Years ago I read an article by Connie Adams that I never forgot. He received some advice concerning men who claim to define their lives by the “grace” of God and how they actually act under pressure.

"Years ago, an older preacher told me of a warning he had received years before from Cled Wallace. He said, "Watch out for the real sweet men. They will rip you to pieces when they get a chance." I have received more unkind and unjust treatment over the years from those who had the most to say about love, kindness, gentleness and such nobler qualities, but who could not tolerate any criticism about what they were teaching.”

"I much prefer to deal with people who will meet you in the open before witnesses to air honest disagreements than those who isolate and insulate themselves in ivory towers where they look down with contempt on the fray below them.”

__________________________________________________________

We are getting your bulletin by e-mail. We would like to know more about you and your work. When did you begin meeting in Charlottesville?

 We especially liked the article about clapping. Roger has been preaching 50 + years. We are grieved about the ''dumbing-down" [lack of respect for God's word ] in the change movement. I'll mail this week's bulletin.
                                                                          Roger  and  Sue

__________________________________________________________

In Response to "The Difference Between a Hypocrite and a Good Person Making a Mistake"

This was a good article. It is certainly something else to reflect on.

From the article:

The hypocrite will insist that he has not sinned, that he has been misunderstood, or that someone else is really at fault. He thus relinquishes the benefit of having an Advocate with the Father, by denying his need for such (1 John 1:8‑2:6).

That's a slightly different definition of hypocrite than I'm familiar with.

However if you switch out "sinned" with "done something wrong" and then transfer the situation to an "allegedly" professional environment and I could say that I've known entirely too many of those type of people during my lifetime.


In Response to “The Christian's Apparel -- Inside and Out"

Hi Brother Rouse, 

Excellent article on Modesty.  I plan to use it in our bulletin this Lord's Day unless you direct otherwise. 


I read your article "The Christian's Apparel --Inside and Out" and was wondering how you feel about Christian women going to male doctors and allowing them to examine them? If that is okay why is it wrong to wear shorts, etc.?

My Reply:

Thanks for your good question. In my article I tried to be specific to public gatherings among adults! I have no problem with what one does in medical situations, or with one's own mate, or among those of the same sex, or how an infant may dress, etc. I may not have made that clear.

Also, I did not name "kinds" of clothing because what something is called does not necessarily make it modest or immodest. I believe shorts can be modest! I run in them every day and have a pair on now. Could you possibly have read into my article what someone else has taught in another setting?

Again, I thank you for your question. I have thought about writing another article going into the endless questions that could arise. I wanted to deal with the attitude of heart from which our clothing must come. You might want to hear the audio of my sermon on the topic that is posted under "additional files."

Please let me know if you have any additional questions! You, by asking these questions, are displaying the kind of heart that will help all of us to better serve the Lord!

May God bless you in your service to Him.

The Response:

Thanks for the quick reply.

I understand one's mate but how does a medical situation make it okay?

Are male doctors not humans who have the ability to lust?

Thanks again.

My Reply:

While these questions are outside the immediate scope of our public apparel, you do raise some good points that ought to be weighed. As professionals, doctors have training in these areas but, as you have said, they are also human.

I will give you my judgment on the matter, but I am open to your thoughts as well. My wife has chosen female doctors for her care. I have chosen male doctors.

In an emergency, I would not refuse any doctor from treating me. I would liken it to the situation of the "ox in the ditch" Jesus gave in His ministry (Luke 14:5).

This is my reasoning based on my desire to do right and help others do right. I do not bind those opinions on others but I hope others will think about these things, as you have.

One other point to consider and it, too, is another opinion. From observation and from talking with other Christians, a person through immodest clothing can be more enticing to bad thoughts than in a setting such as a doctor's examination room. I suppose that in human nature, the thought about the possible and the setting in which it is presented often has more appeal than the reality. Again, that is just another opinion.

What do you think? I would welcome any insight you may have.

The Response:

I agree 100% that women should seek out women for medical care and men seek out men.  I think that this is part of the breaking down of the modesty that the Bible talks about.

We have always sought same-sex doctors for our children and for each other.

I don't think the setting matters.  Folks use that same thing about going to the beach and being immodest.

The problem is that so many are involved in different sex doctors that everyone assumes it is fine.

If you preach or teach about it you will be in trouble.  How can we help others to see this?

My Reply:

I will post this discussion to our feedback section of the webpage!

Thanks for your thoughts


Thank you for this good article. Too many in the church today do not consider modesty, either inside or out.


Dear Larry,  

We read with interest your article on Christian apparel.  It seems that you have identified the problem and also you have given the solution, with scripture.  There is a very real problem among Christians in dressing like the world even when coming to worship. I wonder how we can be different from the world when we dress like them.  This is something we think needs to be addressed at __________.   Thank you for sending your newsletter. The articles are really interesting.    We hope things are well with you and your family. 


Larry, 

Melinda suggested that I log onto your website and read a recent article on "The Christian's Apparel - Inside and Out". 

I read it and passed it on to Shane suggesting that he print it in our hand out bulletin. He did just that this week.  I want to encourage all (parents and children) to read it.  It is excellent. 

I would appreciate receiving your emails and bulletins.  I wish you success in the work there. 

It was always a pleasure to see you at Cahaba Heights. 

Brotherly, 

David

In Response to "Baptist Questions Given Bible Answers"

 

I appreciate the articles that I receive through your email list.  I have read several of them and am encouraged and learn much from them.  I also appreciate your diligent work for the Lord's church. 

But I am emailing you with a concern about part of Mr. Hafley's response to the Baptist who wrote him ("Baptist Questions Given Bible Answers"). 

I agree that generally speaking Baptists (and others in denominations) are not being baptized for their salvation, but because of their salvation.  Yet I do think it is possible that there are those Baptists who believe baptism to be a part of salvation -- even if the preacher who is baptizing them doesn't.  Does the "baptizer"'s heart have anything to do with the one being baptized's salvation?  I don't believe so.  I've never known of qualifications that had to be met before someone could baptize.  All the conditions of salvation are only met by the one desiring to be saved. 

I do realize that all the examples we have in the New Testament are of believers doing the baptizing.  Is that a necessary inference?  It doesn't seem so to me.  It only seems logical that the only ones who would be baptizing would have been believers.   

I have heard of circumstances where a person in a denomination understood the scriptures to teach baptism for the remission of sins and had their preacher to baptize them.  I fail to see how this person's faith is nullified by the one who baptized them. 

Perhaps I am overlooking an obvious teaching of scripture here, and that is definitely possible.  If so, I would appreciate your willingness to teach me "more perfectly".  It may also be that I have misunderstood what you were saying in the above quotes.  If so, I truly apologize and hope you will help me see my misinterpretation. 

I also want to state that I am not defending "Robby"'s salvation...it is clear that he does not understand the necessity of baptism.  I am merely addressing your assertion that denominational preachers cannot baptize one into Christ and disagreeing with it. 

Please know that this is written in the love of truth and love for you and for those being taught.  I am encouraged by your willingness to expose false teaching.

Your brother,

Jarod

My Reply:

Jarod, 

I agree with your points. The things you refute indeed are not certainties, however, at least one point you refute I do not believe brother Hafley made, namely that it was impossible for a non-Christian to baptize another and it be a scriptural baptism. The points he makes are high probabilities, but not a certainty. I will write more later. 

I am going to use your question in my “question night” sermon tomorrow afternoon. Also, I hope to write some material using your question on our feedback page. I will not use your full name. 

Thanks you for a good response! I pray that the Lord will bless you in your work for Him.

Here are the question night outline, PowerPoint and audio files where I address these questions:

ADDITIONAL FILES

Sermon Outline

Power Point

Audio

 


Although I’m not sure how I started to get your bulletin by e-mail, and I am an “institutional”  brother rather than NI,  I am glad to get your bulletin.  I just read much of Brother Hafley’s reply to the Baptist’s questions, and as a former Baptist, I found it intriguing.  I was glad that Larry approached him in a spirit of love and kindness.  I know Larry has had major health problems lately. 

I am in a weekly jail ministry in Gilmer, my small hometown in East Texas, with an NI preacher, Dennis ________.  If you get a magazine that I believe is called the Preceptor, or something like that, Dennis writes for it.  He lives in East Texas, and I have been studying the “issues”  that divide the Lord’s church (social meals in the building, treasury support for children’s homes, etc.) for some years, on and off.  Although I am not yet convinced of the non-institutional position, I do enjoy visiting NI congregations and love my NI brethren, and I have an open mind on these matters.  I am thankful that Dennis works with me although I am “institutional”  (I do not accept the term “liberal,”  as some NI brethren would portray me).

Anyway, just wanted you to know that I am on your email list; 

Phillip

I certainly enjoyed the "Baptist Questions Given Bible Answers" page.

My Reply:

I was so glad to hear from you and receive your encouraging words. I, like you, do not like the labels that are commonly used to describe the stand of another. An open heart and a willingness to open study as you and I have will bring forth the fruits of God in our lives. 

I, too, came from a Baptist background and then had to leave the University church of Christ, in Tuscaloosa Alabama a few years later after additional study. Leaving the church that helped me come out of Denominationalism was the most difficult thing I ever did as a Christian. 25 years later the University church invited a Baptist preacher to be their keynote speaker at their “Youth in Action” program that I once worked with. 

As you know, churches of Christ are not a “monolithic” group, that is, all believing and practicing the same thing. I wished that they were but the stand of one generation does not mean the next generation will. I treat churches like I do individuals, I will let them tell me what they believe rather than label and avoid them.  

I believe that you and brother ________ are doing a good work. I would work with you too in that way  if I had an opportunity.

The Response:

Brother Rouse:

I just read your reply to me.  Thanks so much for writing back. 

Nearly 6 years ago, I left the congregation here in Gilmer ,Texas, and moved my membership to a rural congregation 11 miles from my home.  I did so because the young preacher here then was liberal.  And like you, I too would have left any congregation that had a Baptist speaker. 

Just tonight, I noted with dismay in the Christian Chronicle that the North Richland Hills “church of Christ”  here in Texas was helping a Baptist church pay off the debt that it was about to default on!  I’ve always wondered why in the world people say they are members of the “church of Christ’  when they obviously do not believe and practice what the true church of Christ has taught and practiced for centuries? 

Of course, we should love our Baptist friends—you and I are former Baptists, and we certainly understand that.  But I feel sure you will agree with me that we do not show love for them by abetting their error with a financial handout to pay off their church debt.  That is like “helping”  an alcoholic by giving him money for a drink. 

It grieves my heart to see “brethren”  participating in such terrible error as is occurring at North Richland Hills and elsewhere!  At the same time, there are ways to remedy error that are better than others.  Some believe the way is to “take the hide off”  such wayward congregations for 30 paragraphs in a watchdog publication.  To me, that is the wrong way to correct error!  Paul warned us in Romans against devouring one another. 

Yes, I think Scripture obliges us to expose false teachers.  But we must also remember Galatians 6:1--and we should express love toward the sinning brethren, and pray for their repentance.  We also should never claim that we ourselves are perfect, and we must be on guard toward self-righteousness.  Many “sound’ brethren, who are well-intentioned in their efforts to combat error in the church, have a bad case of holier-than-thou-ism. 

In closing, I wanted to clear one thing up.  I believe I originally wrote you late at night after taking medication, as I am doing now, and I left some wording out of my final sentence to you.  I wrote to you that I thought I’d let you know that I was on your e-mail list.  What I meant to say, I suppose, was that I was on your e-mail list, AND am glad to be!  I’m sorry for the incomplete thought.  The lateness of the hour, and the effect of the sleeping medication, are probably to blame for that.  In addition, my elderly mother was hospitalized Tuesday on the same day that I was diagnosed with hypertension, so that also may have short-circuited my brain a bit. 

Anyway, I am always glad to hear from brethren like you who have a good attitude, and who want to stand for the truth.  Please keep me posted on what brethren in your part of the nation are doing.  Let’s not let the erring ones get us down.  And if you have any thoughts on the divisive “issues”  I have mentioned in the church, I will be glad to examine them. 

Gratefully,

Phillip

Editors Note: Here is a sermon outline, PowerPoint and Audio of why I left the local church that was involved with practices that they would not defend.

 


In Response to "On the First Day of the Week"

Dear Brethren, 

We are studying Hebrews 10:25 and some questions have come up.  Could you give me your input on the following: 

Does Heb. 10:25 include all services, or just the First Day of the Week? 

Some say that it includes all of the following: Sunday Bible Study, Regular Morning Worship, Sunday Evening, and Wednesday Evening, while others say it should include Ladies Bible Study, Men's Business Meetings, Congregational Meetings, all the days of a Gospel Meeting, or any time there is a "church" meeting of any kind. 

Also, should missing Bible Study, Sunday Evening and Wednesday Evening be construed serious enough for disfellowshiping?  If so, where are the scriptures for these meetings (there is no question about the morning worship on the First Day of the Week)? 

Also, are we putting ourselves in the same class of people as the Pharisees (making laws whereGod has not made) and using them as a test of fellowship?

Hope you can help. 

Harold

Editors Note: I responded to this brother by answering these questions on our question night. Here are the question night outline, PowerPoint and audio files where I address these questions:

 


In Response to "Fight Boredom"

Please tell Stephen that his article is absolutely wonderful and is inspiring.  Will share it with my girls as they constantly complain of 'being bored'.


Great article that Stephen wrote. I did not know he had it in him! (though I am not surprised). I told him so on his blog.


 Stephen did such a good job in this article "Fight Boredom!"


In Response to "When To End A Bible Study"

"When to end a Bible study" should be preceded by "When to not start a Bible study." Why insert a Bible lesson when anger and dishonesty are present? Christians need to learn when to shut the book and let the gospel come alive through friendship and careful listening. Those who are full of "irrational anger" and "dishonesty" may have good points to make that need to be heard and heeded. It's hard to call someone a hypocrite who is genuinely interested in what you have to say and will accept your criticism.


Thanks for the article you wrote. A great reminder for me when it comes to making efforts to reach the lost. Helping people to open their hearts to the truth is indeed so very important to being as effective as possible in teaching others. Moving on when hearts are clearly closed is also critical to being as productive as possible and to using our time wisely as a worker in the vineyard of the Lord.


In Response to "When The Kingdom of God Appears to Fail"

Your article "When the Kingdom of God Appears to Fail" addresses a very important need and brings a very important reminder to us all. Just consider how many "lousy" churches I have been a part of and the temptation to conclude that the kingdom has failed!  Brethren are too quick to generalize and express doom and gloom without looking at the bigger picture. I am very glad you wrote on this subject!


General Responses and Questions

Larry, 

It’s been a while since we last spoke or saw each other.  I hope you are doing well.  How is the work going in Charlottesville?  It was quite easy is to find you using a Google search and I noticed you are a prolific blogger.   I wanted to ask you some questions given your extensive and up to date reading of James Woodruff, LaGard Smith, and others.  I sorted through my collection of papers and found your series on “Institutionalism--Then and Now An Overview”, which you preached at the Lacey’s Spring congregation several years ago.  I did this after hearing some sermons this past week.  My questions are as follows: 

1.)     How do bad personal experiences influence a preacher to make steps toward a wider fellowship?

2.)     What book would someone have read if they really thought the true practice of the 1st century Lord’s Supper was a common meal that was shared during the service?

3.)     Should someone think a false teacher is only a person who has insincere motives in their teaching?

4.)     Should we think that non-instrumental music in worship is a logical and natural conclusion from the N.T.? 

Considering men that have moved away from the faith, which you have known personally, what were the warning signs in their public preaching?  I would like to call them veiled subtleties that leave you uneasy after hearing the sermons. 

I hope to hear from you soon! 

Chet

Editors Note: I responded to this brother by answering these questions on our question night. Here are the question night outline, PowerPoint and audio files where I address these questions:

 


You put out an excellent bulletin, and I commend and appreciate your forthright stand for truth reflected therein. You recently ran, I believe, Floyd Decker's 1944 article on why he left the Christian Church. Would it be convenient for you to email me a copy, or tell me how I can to your earlier issues than are on your website?

Yours in and for Christ,

Jere


I want to commend you on the fine articles that you send out from time to time.  The articles are always very good and profitable.  I have used several for devotionals, sermons or bulletin articles.  Keep up the good work.

Sincerely, 

Ed

God bless you in your work in that area.  Since Virginia is in my heart, we're especially grateful that you are there and the work is starting off well.  It's exciting! - praise God!


I love reading the bulletins every week so thank you for sending them to me I do appreciate it.  

Enjoy the variety of topics covered.


  Thank you for sending your "bulletin" by E-mail.  I thoroughly enjoy reading your articles and sermons.  You are obviously doing a great work in Charlottesville.  Keep-it-up! 

 Dan


I guess someone noticed our last names and added me to your mailing list. It's not often I run across another group of Rouse's, especially in our family of churches. I see you are an evangelist in Charlottesville Va. I am an elder in the Atlanta Church of Christ (serving in the Central Gwinnett ministry in Gwinnett County Ga, see www.centralgwinnett.org ). My part of the Rouse family comes from eastern North Carolina, going back at least 200 years in that area. 

Anyway it's great to hear of another Rouse out there! 

Alan


 In Response to “Benjamin Franklin on the Failure of Creeds”

 

I'm not sure if I understand your take on the creeds. If "creed" comes from the credo (I believe) and someone says "no creed, but the bible" isn't this itself a creed (an I believe statement)?

Thanks,

Jeffery

9999999999999999999999999999999999

My Reply

Hello Jeffery,

Thank you for your well thought out question. You are right concerning the general definition of a creed being a statement of belief. I have no problem with someone relating what they believe in this way. Obviously my website and even this e-mail is an expression of what I believe at this point in time. However, I am wiling to change when the evidence is presented and thus my "creed" in that sense will change. Also, I do not expect people to follow what I say because I said it. I fully expect others to test what I say from the scriptures first, and then stand upon the scriptures and not just from following any expression from my limited knowledge (Acts 17:11). 

The 19th century writer, Benjamin Franklin, was dealing with official creeds of the denominations of his day. I do believe that these official denominational creeds represent a roadblock to open Bible study and genuine change towards God. In addition creeds will entrench error in a group and become a major roadblock to eliminating division. 

Why not take the Bible alone and leave all official creeds? 

I am attaching a good article on this subject for your consideration. 

Thank you again for the good question. I am open to hear and consider any response you may have. 

May the Lord bless you in your service to Him. 

In Christian Love,

Larry Rouse

Click to Read: The Real Protestant Position on the All-Sufficient Bible

Jeff's Response 6/26/2006

You ask "Why not take the Bible alone and leave all official creeds?"

The next question would be which Bible. Once you answer that, you are expanding on your creed "the bible alone." I'm assuming you would say the 66 books of the protestant Bible, etc. (which is stated in some of the confessions, e.g. Westminster). Then, your are going to have to answer what Jesus (since there are so many different take, e.g. the Jesus of the JWs, Mormons, etc.). Once you start defining who Jesus is, you are expanding on your creed "the bible alone, Christ alone," which is what the confessions do.

So, we "want" people to believe the 66 books of the protestant Bible and in the divinity of Jesus, etc. We don't want people to be open minded, in that sense, to these particular doctrinal, since they are foundation to the Christian faith. No doubt, we need to test all things, holding fast to that which is good/right/true. But, creed and confessions do keep one from doing this...at least as I see it.

Thanks for your time,

Jeff

9999999999999999999999999999999999

My Reply

Hello Jeffery,


As I answered in my first letter, whenever I or anyone else express a personal belief then that does fit the general definition of a "creed." My opposition was to official creeds that tie men down to a mindless conformity and not a living, dynamic faith that tests, examines and changes when the evidence is there. I cannot oppose the general definition of a creed since if I opposed that would be in  opposition to faith itself
!
"But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him"  (Hebrews 11:6).  

You are again correct concerning "which Bible" and "which Jesus!" One should willingly test these and any other personal "creeds" or beliefs. I will be excited to share my evidence with you on these things.

Before I go further I would like to know what you believe. Where do you stand in respect to the historical Jesus? May I ask you the question Jesus asked the Pharisees: "What do you think about the Christ? Whose Son is He? (Matt 22:41-42)

I will send material on the questions concerning the Bible and Jesus tomorrow. I am looking forward to further discussions!
 

In Christian Love,

Larry Rouse


 Name:
 E-mail Address: 
 Topic:
 Question:

        


 

 
 
© 2005 - North Charlottesville church of Christ - All rights reserved!