![]() |
|
|
Home | About Us | Past Featured Subjects | Bulletins | Sermons & Audio | Studies In The Cross Of Christ | Classes | Questions |
|
|
Click Here for the Latest Edition of the Charlottesville Beacon
Sermons Preached in Harrisonburg, VA
Receiving Forgiveness (4) by Larry Rouse
What is God's
Forgiveness Like? (2)
by Larry Rouse
Instrumental
Music and the Cross of Christ
Where
Are the Dead
The
Foundation of Forgiveness (1) Sermons Preached in Williamsburg, VA
In Search of the Servant of God (Part 1) by Larry Rouse Planning to Visit Us?
What to Expect Thoughts To Ponder
The
highest reward Restudying the Issues of the 50's and 60's
Bill
Hall Series
Kitchens and
Fellowship Halls
You will need
Click here to
Click here to
Assembly Times Sunday Bible Classes (10:00 am) AM Worship (11:00 am)
Wednesday Bible Classes (7:00 pm)
Location
180 Townwood Drive Charlottesville, VA 22901
|
|
|
Premillennialism and the Bible By Jefferson David Tant Our nation was shocked, saddened and angered on September 11, 2001 by the events that transpired in our nation—the cold-blooded murder of thousands. And people wonder, why this hatred, why this insane rage? A few days after the atrocities, I spent some time talking with a peaceful Islamic young woman from Bangladesh that my wife and I have befriended. She asked me the same question, and although she understood some of it, there was a part of it concerning which she had no clue. She has been threatened, with a bloody ax drawn on her whiteboard, and hateful things shouted at her and her friends. Why do
they hate us? There are many other
factors, but these are the core ideas that drive Premillennialism.
Premillennialism
teaches that Abraham’s descendants are “in the flesh” rather than “in
faith.” But note that the gospel teaches that there is now no more
distinction between Jew and Gentile in God’s sight, but that the true
descendant of Abraham is the Christian. “For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh” (Romans 2:28-29). The point is carried further in Galatians 3:7: “Know therefore that they that are of faith, the same are sons of Abraham?” And later in the chapter he writes: “For ye are all sons of God, through faith, in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ did put on Christ. There can be neither Jew nor Greek, there can be neither bond nor free, there can be no male and female; for ye all are one [man] in Christ Jesus. And if ye are Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, heirs according to promise” (26-29). Paul clearly points out that the true sons of God are now related by a spiritual connection, not by being born into a Jewish family.
We see in Ephesians
3:10-11
that the church was in the eternal purpose of God, and not a mere
“afterthought” or “substitute.” God has revealed his will “to the intent
that now unto the principalities and the powers in the heavenly places might
be made known through the church the manifold wisdom of God, according to
the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Do you
see the point? The existence of the church was “according to the eternal
purpose” of God. Yet Premillennialism denies this, saying the church would
not have been set up if the Jews had only received the kingdom when Christ
came. "I glorified thee on the earth, having accomplished the work which thou hast given me to do." Here Jesus claims he accomplished the mission of the Father as prophesied in many Old Testament passages. One of them is Dan. 2:44. As Daniel is interpreting the dream of Babylon’s King Nebuchadnezzar, he describes the four world kingdoms that succeed one another. The fourth kingdom was to be the great Roman Empire. Look at what Daniel said by inspiration from God: “And in the days of those kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, nor shall the sovereignty thereof be left to another people; but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.” God says that during
the Roman Empire, his kingdom would be established. Christ said he fulfilled
what he was given to do. But Premillennialism denies this, claiming Christ
failed in his mission. Question: If Christ failed the first time, what would
keep him from failing the second, third or fourth time?
Matt. 25:31-34, 41 teach that the good and bad are to be judged at the same time. “But
when the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the angels with him,
then shall he sit on the throne of his glory: and before him shall be
gathered all the nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as
the shepherd separateth the sheep from the goats; and he shall set the sheep
on his right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto
them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom
prepared for you from the foundation of the world…Then shall he say also
unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into the eternal fire
which is prepared for the devil and his angels.” Does the picture
presented here allow a thousand years between? In no way. But the
Premillennial view separates the judgments by one thousand years. “Behold, he cometh with the clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they that pierced him; and all the tribes of the earth shall mourn over him.” Premillennialism says that when Christ comes only the righteous shall see him first, and the unrighteous later. But this verse says that every eye shall see his return. Which shall we believe?
“And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, the old serpent, which is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years, and cast him into the abyss, and shut it, and sealed it over him, that he should deceive the nations no more, until the thousand years should be finished: after this he must be loosed for a little time. And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and such as worshipped not the beast, neither his image, and received not the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand; and they lived, and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead lived not until the thousand years should be finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: over these the second death hath no power; but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years” (Rev. 20:1-6).
“It is on this passage that the whole doctrine of the millennium as such has been founded. It is true that there are elsewhere in the scriptures abundant promises that the gospel will ultimately spread over the world; but the notion of a millennium as such is found in this passage alone” (Albert Barnes, noted Presbyterian commentator). I don’t propose to unravel all the mystery of the passage, but consider this: Premillennials admit that many expressions in the chapter are figurative and symbolical and cannot be taken literally, but they insist on a literal one thousands years. The advocates of the theory read many things into the passage that absolutely are not there. Consider the fact that in the passage there is:
Another Scripture that
gives these mistaken teachers a problem is “For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we that are alive, that are left unto the coming of the Lord, shall in no wise precede them that are fallen asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven, with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we that are alive, that are left, shall together with them be caught up in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord” (15-17). These verses clearly
teach that those in the graves will be caught up together with the saved of
those alive to meet the Lord in the air, and thus ever to be with the Lord.
It does not say one word about Christ ever setting foot on this earth, or
the saints returning to the earth. But Premillennialism teaches a round
trip, saying these shall return to the earth to reign after a short time. This verse shows that
Christ was not anticipating an early rule or an earthly kingdom, and
therefore the charges against him were mistaken. If they were mistaken, the
modern theorists are also mistaken. What is the significance of this prophecy? Christ cannot occupy a throne, ruling in Jerusalem in Judah, since he is of the lineage of David and of the tribe of Judah. The first chapter of Matthew goes to great lengths to prove Christ’s genealogy. Now, if Coniah was the last of David’s seed to sit on a throne in Judah, there is no way that those who teach Premillennialism can get Christ to sit on David’s throne and rule for a thousand years in Jerusalem. God says it won’t happen! Rather, Christ is now King of kings and Lord of lords, ruling from heaven. “I charge thee in the sight of God, who giveth life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who before Pontius Pilate witnessed the good confession; that thou keep the commandment, without spot, without reproach, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: which in its own times he shall show, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords; who only hath immortality, dwelling in light unapproachable; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honor and power eternal. Amen” (I Tim 6:13-16). Notice that this speaks of Christ’s reigning in the present tense, not in the future as the Premillennial theory would have us believe.
|
|
| © 2009 - North Charlottesville church of Christ - All rights reserved! |