Home | About Us | Past Featured Subjects | Bulletins | Sermons & Audio | Studies In The Cross Of Christ | Classes | Questions
Click Here for the Latest Edition of the Charlottesville Beacon
Thoughts To Ponder
A sermon that is not directly drawn from Scripture is orphaned, however bright or clever it may be.
The Bible was not given to
increase our
knowledge but to change our lives.
The Silence of the Bible
by H. Leo Boles
There has been a great deal of discussion
on "The Silence of the Bible." Some have emphasized the respect we should
have for the authority of God by respecting the silence of the Bible. Others
have taught that where the Bible is silent, we have a right to speak. The
issue is, "Does God give to man the right to teach and practice in the name
of Christ anything about which there is no divine revelation?" Has God given
sufficient guidance in all affairs that pertain to the work and worship of
the Lord? Has He left some things to the wisdom and judgment of man? How
shall we know what has been left to the judgment of man in the work and
worship of the Lord?
If, by His silence in revelation, God has granted to man the right to teach
and practice some things, then there opens a field of strife and division.
Man cannot agree with his fellows as to what must be brought in, and no
greater source of division can be found than the different standards of men.
The Bible clearly teaches that man should not add to the word of God.
"Ye shall not add unto
the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish from it, that ye may
keep the commandments of Jehovah your God which I command you." (Deut. 4:2).
Here we learn that Jehovah would not let the children of Israel add to nor
take from anything He had commanded them. Jehovah had given the law, and it
was sufficient to guide them in all of their work and worship. They were to
let the law stand, without additions, subtractions, or alterations. This
enforced upon them to respect God's silence on any subject. If they could
not add to or take from the law, they were not to impose human judgments
upon the people. To do so would be to add to or take from the law. They had
to respect the silence of Jehovah on the work and worship they were to
perform.
The New Testament teaches the same
principle: "I
testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book,
If any man shall add unto them, God shall add unto him the plagues which are
written in this book: and if any man shall take away from the words of the
book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the tree of life,
and out of the holy city, which are written in this book." (Rev. 22:18-19).
This demands that man respect the silence of divine revelation. No one is
permitted to add to or take from the teachings of the New Testament. It will
not do to say that the above quotation applies only to the book of
Revelation. God would not forbid one from adding to or subtracting from only
one book in the New Testament, but would also grant man the privilege of
adding to and taking from other books.
This principle applies to all the books of the New Testament. Other
teachings show this to be true.
"Now these things,
brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and Apollos for your
sakes; that in us ye might learn not to go beyond the things which are
written..." (1 Cor. 4:6). These
Corinthians were thus forbidden to go beyond the things that were written.
They were to respect the silence of God — the silence of the Scriptures —
and not make any alterations. God would not forbid the church at Corinth to
"go beyond the
things which are written," and at
the same time grant other churches to add what they pleased or to leave off
anything they did not wish to teach or practice. What He says here to the
church at Corinth is applied to all of the churches, and is applicable to
His people through all ages.
The same truth is expressed by John:
"Whosoever goeth onward
and abideth not in the teaching of Christ, hath not God: he that abideth in
the teaching, the same hath both the Father and the Son. If any one cometh
unto you, and bringeth not this teaching, receive him not into your house,
and give him no greeting: for he that giveth him greeting partaketh in his
evil works." (2 Jn. 9-11). This
teaches that the silence of
"the teachings of
Christ" must be respected. John is
writing to no particular church, but Christians in general. Hence, the
principle of respecting the silence of
"the teachings of
Christ" is here taught by John.
One is safe when one follows the teachings of God. One impeaches the wisdom
of God when one attempts to make any alterations in "what is written" in the
New Testament. In doing so, one must take the attitude that either God did
not know enough to give man a complete guide for all ages, or that God has
left man free to make additions where God has not spoken.
The foundation of the argument that man may speak where the Bible is silent
rests, like Dagon's temple, upon two pillars, which, so long as they
continue sound, will support all the theories of men. The first pillar is
that "the church of Christ, like all other societies, has power to make laws
for its government." The second pillar is that, "where the sacred Scriptures
are silent, human authority may interpose." But if some Samson can be found
to shake these pillars from their bases, the whole edifice, with the lords
of the Philistines in their seats and the multitude with which it is
crowded, will be involved in one common ruin. If the two principles
mentioned above are granted, the arguments cannot be refuted. But if it can
be shown that the principles are false, the conclusions, with all the
arguments based on them, are false.
First, the church of Christ is not like other societies. It is different
from all human institutions, because Christ framed a constitution for it
which is different from any of the teachings of man. No one can show that
God permits man to speak or act in the name of Christ where the New
Testament is silent. There is not a single sentence in all the New Testament
that warrants man to speak, where the New Testament is silent, in the name
of Christ; there is no Scripture that grants man such authority. How, then,
can man know that he has the right to speak where the Bible is silent? No
human association, no individual has any right to interpose authority where
the New Testament neither enjoins nor forbids. We must respect the authority
of God here.
To interpose and draft regulations where the New Testament is silent is to
legislate for God's people where God has not legislated. It is a fearful
thing to impose anything in the name of Christ upon God's people when God
has not spoken on that point. If He has spoken, then we must respect what He
has said. If He has not spoken, then we must respect His wisdom in remaining
silent. It seems that anyone would know that the floodgate would be open and
all sorts of innovations would be brought into the work and worship of the
Lord's people if we do not respect the silence of the Bible. To respect the
silence of the Bible is to respect God. To break that silence is to impeach
the wisdom, love, and authority of God. It is to commit the high crime of
presumptuous sin.
"Every scripture
inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for
correction, for instruction which is in righteousness: that the man of God
may be complete, furnished completely unto every good work." (2 Tim. 3:16-
17).
Respond to this Article on
My Blog:
http://larryrouse.blogspot.com/2008/02/silence-of-bible.html
Other
Articles
Are There Few Who Are Saved?
False Teaching 101
Food, Fun and Fellowship