Psychiatrists tell us that most people who
are deceived wanted to be deceived. At least they had their minds set to try
to believe a certain type of message. This is the tremendous advantage the
medical quack has with the seriously or incurably ill -- they want to
believe him. The false teacher enjoys exactly the same advantage when he
says what is pleasant and desirable to his hearers. These purveyors of false
hope are not without ability and usually exercise themselves to develop a
smooth, reasonable and credible presentation. But the real element of
deception is not ordinarily so much the ability to intellectually confuse as
it is the ability to understand and pander to peoples' wants and weaknesses.
This is the key to successful religious innovation, ancient and modern.
Jeroboam's arguments in leading Israel into
tragic apostasy is a vivid case in point. Notwithstanding his position as
king, his success is astonishing in bringing about a drastic and popular
change in the religious devotions of a nation in a single generation. His
own appointed places stood as rivals with Jerusalem as seats of worship (Deut.
12:14; I Kings 12: 28,
29), and the people have three
holy places instead of one. He instituted his own distinctive features, such
as images and non-Levitical priests (I Kings
12:28, 31).
He changed the dates of the feast days according as "he had devised of his
own heart" (Lev. 23:34,
39; I Kings 12:33). So instead
of religious loyalty and unity among the people, we have a deep division:
three holy places instead of one, two orders of worship instead of one,
utterly unauthorized imagery, rival priesthoods and competitive feasts. And
one of Jeroboam's establishments was in Bethel, a scant twelve miles from
Jerusalem, a brazen declaration of the division and disregard for true
worship. For a man to accomplish so much, even for the wrong, requires
ability and an insight into the wants and weaknesses of a people. The
arguments of Jeroboam reflect his possession of this insight.
1. He appealed to comfort,
convenience and self-indulgence:
"It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem" (I Kings
12:28).
Jerusalem
was indeed a long way away for those who had no problem of pollution from
automobile exhaust. It was a trip that consumed considerable time and
expense. No doubt many of the less zealous were glad to hear a man of
Jeroboam's prominence and personal vitality and force say it was 'too much'
to expect. He understands. And who would be so narrow-minded as to say that
God would condemn worship in Dan but accept it in Jerusalem?
2. He appealed to their sense
of piety and worship: "Behold
thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of
Egypt"
(12:28).
Do not underestimate Jeroboam's cleverness by charging him here with trying
to tell Jews that Jehovah is not God. This would likely have so offended a
point of fact and faith so basic that it would have been nearly impossible
to believe. But the people did delight in having a tangible representation
of deity. Perhaps it was patterned somewhat after the cherubim, as some
suggest, which would have augured well for Jeroboam in appealing to the
people to identify God with his calves and to seek him therein.
3. He appealed to pride:
The Israelites had already bolted from Judah in a huff upon hearing the rash
words of Rehoboam. They had rebelled, saying "What portion have we in David?
Neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse: to your tents, O Israel"
(I Kings 12:16).
Yes, Judah offers us nothing! Let's go home! Jeroboam offered them holy
places in their homeland! Israel is as good as Judah. Dan and Bethel are as
satisfactory as Jerusalem. Sectional pride can run strong.
4. He appealed to nostalgic
and precious memories by the very selections of Dan and Bethel as holy
places, and Shechem as capital.
Aside from its convenience to the people in the north, Dan would be
associated with the worship of God through the teraphim covered with silver
(Judges 18:15-31).
Jeroboam devised a calf of gold. Bethel
was strongly associated with Jacob and Samuel and thus was tender in their
sentimentalities historically, and became the site of a pretentious temple.
Shechem recalls the days of Abraham, and was a priestly city. These are
"our" cities.
5. He implied that all is
well: it is simply the old worship for those who have no portion in Judah
and no desire to support her establishments.
It was a religious revolution, but it is doubtful that most of the people
really knew it. What he said, they liked, and wanted to believe, and did
believe. Deceived, and in error, all the while thinking all is well and we
serve God!
All successful innovations more or less
possess the same ties to popular taste, convenience, pride, apparent
reasonableness and innocence, and piety. Howbeit all were not deceived. Some
stubbornly resisted the innovations, preferring God's authority for man's
"just as good as ..." Though to all appearances and for his purposes
Jeroboam succeeded, he never had the authority or approval of God, and his
apparent success not only led Israel to its downfall but wrested the kingdom
from Jeroboam and destroyed his posterity from off the face of the earth.
And still some say, "You can't argue with success." You'd better argue with
it, my friend, and go all the way back to Jerusalem.